Shandong TTCA Biochemistry Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
Jungbunzlauer Canada Inc. (“JBL”) seeks to intervene as a matter of right in the instant action. See Motion to Intervene as a Matter of Right (“JBL’s Motion”). The action challenges material injury determinations by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) in antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of citric acid and certain citrate salts (together “citric acid”) from the People’s Republic of China (“China”). The action does not challenge the material injury determination by ITC in the antidumping duty investigation of citric acid from…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Spring Wire Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Gerald Metals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Nsk Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Usec Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Canadian Wheat Board v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shandong Ttca Biochemistry Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Nucor Fastener Division v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Appointment of United States Trade Representative, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2017