Legal Opinion

Mingenback v. Howell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1951No. 34709PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The parties will be referred to in the order of their appearance in the trial court.

E. C. Mingenback was the owner of three sections of land in Cimarron county, Oklahoma. He and co-defendant Paul Eisenbart, both residents of Kansas, were copartners in the operation of certain farm lands in Kansas and Oklahoma, including the above lands, and they owned a considerable amount of farm machinery.

Plaintiff Max Howell was a farmer. In February, 1946, the parties entered into an oral agreement whereby Howell and his wife were to farm the above mentioned lands. The testimony is in sharp conflict as to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Exchange Bank of Commerce v. MeadorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Bounds v. GoochSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Britt v. Doty, Adm'xSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Oklahoma State Bank of OcheLata v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Denver Producing & Refining Co. v. MeekerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wetsel v. Independent School District I-1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Wickham v. BelvealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API