Legal Opinion
Quiksilver, Inc. v. Kymsta Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 18, 2007No. CV 02-5497-VBF(RCx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS: (1) ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO DEPOSITION QUESTIONS; AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF ROXY CONSUMER SURVEY MATERIALS AND ANSWERS TO RELATED DEPOSITION QUESTIONS
ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On August 29, 2007, defendant Kymsta Corp. filed a notice of motion and motion to *581compel answers to deposition questions to Kathleen McKnight Armstrong and John Sommer, a joint stipulation, and the supporting declarations of James D. Nguyen and Scott Rahn, with exhibits, and plaintiff…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, Inc. v. On Point Events, LP.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Dagdagan v. City of VallejoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Brandt v. Old Dominion Freight Line Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 2020
- Shreves v. Frontier Rail CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2021