Legal Opinion
Crosthwait Equipment Co., Inc. v. John Deere Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1993No. 92-7181PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COBB, District Judge:
After a jury verdict, was returned for the plaintiffs, the district court granted defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on the verdict and denied defendant’s motion for judgment or a new trial on its counterclaim for damages. Plaintiffs appeal; defendants cross-appeal as to damages. For the reasons given below, we AFFIRM the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, and REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings as to damages.
I
Curtis and Ruth Crosthwait, with their son Allen E. Crosthwait, owned and operated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Simms T. NORMAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Beck Enterprises, Inc. v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Continental Cas. Co. v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
- Daniel J. Vogel and Desmia G. Vogel v. American Warranty Home Service Corporation And/or Its Successors, Pioneer Warranty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Teddy Gutierrez, and Pamela Calderon Maria De La Cruz v. Excel Corporation, Excel Corporation, Frances Ponce v. Excel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Bartley v. Euclid, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Bartley v. Euclid, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Bartley v. Euclid, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Crosthwait Equipment Co., Inc. v. John Deere CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.