Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Edge Moor Iron Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 22, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The provision for payment to the preferred stockholders in event of liquidation, found in paragraph B of the charter, is that they shall receive the par value of their shares “with all unpaid dividends thereon.” It is this phrase that gives rise to the controversy.

The preferred stockholders contend that the omission of the company to pay dividends to them since October 1, 1931, must now be repaired out of the assets regardless of whether or not those assets contain surplus above capital, and regardless of whether or not the dividends provided by the charter were cumulative or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Penington v. Commonwealth Hotel Construction Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  2. Penington v. Commonwealth Hotel Construction Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
  3. Belfast & Moosehead Lake Railroad v. City of BelfastSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
  4. Hazeltine v. Belfast & Moosehead Lake RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  5. West Chester & Philadelphia Railroad v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Staar Surgical Co. v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Goldman v. Postal Telegraph, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  3. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. CoxSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  4. Weinberg v. Baltimore Brick CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1955
  5. Waldner v. Equitable Loan Soc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API