Legal Opinion

Hazeltine v. Belfast & Moosehead Lake Railroad

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 6, 1887PublishedCited by 18 opinions

On report. Bill in equity, heard ou bill, answer and agreed statement. The opinion states the facts. cited : Belfast & M. H. L. R. R. Co. v. Belfast, 77 Maine, 445 ; Morawetz, Corp. (2 ed-) § § 440, 441, 459; Green’s Brice’s Ultra Vires, 164; Richardson v. Railroad Co. 44 Yt. 613 ; Kent v. Quids Silver Mining Co. 12 Hun. 53; Barnard v. Railroad Co. 7 Allen, 521; Boardman v. Railroad Co. 84 N. Y. 157 ; Thompson v. Railroad Co. 45 N. Y. 468 ; Prouty v. Railroad Co. 1 Hun, 655;…

Read the full summary

On report. Bill in equity, heard ou bill, answer and agreed statement. The opinion states the facts. cited : Belfast & M. H. L. R. R. Co. v. Belfast, 77 Maine, 445 ; Morawetz, Corp. (2 ed-) § § 440, 441, 459; Green’s Brice’s Ultra Vires, 164; Richardson v. Railroad Co. 44 Yt. 613 ; Kent v. Quids Silver Mining Co. 12 Hun. 53; Barnard v. Railroad Co. 7 Allen, 521; Boardman v. Railroad Co. 84 N. Y. 157 ; Thompson v. Railroad Co. 45 N. Y. 468 ; Prouty v. Railroad Co. 1 Hun, 655; Beers v.. Bridgeport Co. 42 Conn. 17; Pratt v. Pratt, 33 Conn. 446; Scott v. Eagle Fire. Go. 7 Paige, 203 ; Jermain v.…

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The facts of this case and most of its questions were before the court in the case of Belfast, &c. R. R. Co. v. Belfast, 77 Maine, 445. The preferred stockholders of the company are now complainants against the company and its directors, seeking to obtain through a court of equity dividends on their stock.

On March 20, 1886, When this bill was brought, the following facts existed: The road was, and since May 10, 1871, had been leased to the Maine Central Railroad Company, the lease to run until May 10, 1921, the lessee to operate the road during the intervening period at its own risk and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Warren v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. LoebSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. v. CassillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Hazel Atlas Glass Co. v. Van Dyk & Reeves, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  4. Inscho v. Mid-continent Development Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Gay v. Gay's Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API