Miami-Dade County v. Valdes
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
In an excellent opinion by Judge Venzer, the appellate division determined that the County’s refusal to relax the single-family residential zoning on the respondent’s property notwithstanding that it was effectively surrounded1 by a busy thoroughfare, commercial property, and a group home,2 resulted in the continuance of an impermissible instance of “reverse spot zoning.” See Tollius v. City of Miami, 96 So.2d 122 (Fla.1957); City of Miami Beach v. Robbins, 702 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Debes v. City of Key West, 690 So.2d 700 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); City of Coral…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Deerfield Beach v. VaillantSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Tollius v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Martin County v. YusemSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Walls v. EndelSupreme Court of Florida · 1883
- Allapattah Community Association, Inc. v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richard Road Estates, LLC v. Miami-Dade County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Banco Industrial De Venezuela, C.A. v. De SaadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Banco Industrial De Venezuela, C.A. v. De SaadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Miami-Dade County v. ValdesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- The Cottage, Inc Comfy Cottage v. Pasco CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025