Legal Opinion

Miami-Dade County v. Valdes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 21, 2009No. 3D08-1064PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

In an excellent opinion by Judge Venzer, the appellate division determined that the County’s refusal to relax the single-family residential zoning on the respondent’s property notwithstanding that it was effectively surrounded1 by a busy thoroughfare, commercial property, and a group home,2 resulted in the continuance of an impermissible instance of “reverse spot zoning.” See Tollius v. City of Miami, 96 So.2d 122 (Fla.1957); City of Miami Beach v. Robbins, 702 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Debes v. City of Key West, 690 So.2d 700 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); City of Coral…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Deerfield Beach v. VaillantSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Tollius v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Martin County v. YusemSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  4. Walls v. EndelSupreme Court of Florida · 1883
  5. Allapattah Community Association, Inc. v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richard Road Estates, LLC v. Miami-Dade County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. Banco Industrial De Venezuela, C.A. v. De SaadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Banco Industrial De Venezuela, C.A. v. De SaadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Miami-Dade County v. ValdesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. The Cottage, Inc Comfy Cottage v. Pasco CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API