Legal Opinion

People v. MacLeod

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 4, 2008No. 06SC705PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

I. Introduction

At issue here is whether the rape shield statute, section 18-3^107, C.R.S. (2007), and its procedural requirements apply when evidence of a witness’s sexual history is not being offered for the truth of the matter asserted. In this prosecution appeal of a question of law, as permitted by section 16-12-102(1), C.R.S. (2007), the People argue that the rape shield statute applies regardless of the proponent’s purpose for introducing the evidence. The People request that we disapprove the court of appeals’ decision in this case, People v. MacLeod, 155 P.3d 494 (Colo.App.2006),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. People v. MelilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. People v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. WeissSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. People v. KyleColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. VillaColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. TorrezColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. People v. SalazarSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  4. Pierson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  5. v. N.T.BColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API