Legal Opinion

People v. Salazar

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 19, 2012No. 11SA305PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boatright

T1 In this original proceeding under C.AR. 21, we consider the trial court's admissibility determination as to testimony regarding specific instances of a purported alternative suspect's prior sexual conduct, which the defendant sought to introduce to challenge the alleged victim's identification in a case alleging sexual assault on a child. The People petitioned for relief from the trial court's order finding the evidence admissible. We issued a rule to show cause. Because the trial court abused its discretion when it determined that the probative value of the alleged prior sexual conduct…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Stull v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Yusem v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. People v. MelilloSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Krutsinger v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re People v. ElmarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  2. People v. RheaColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. v. Dominguez-CastorColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Ruibal v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  5. People v. GwinnColorado Court of Appeals · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API