Legal Opinion
Dailey v. Barrow
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 31, 1968No. Civ. A. Nos. 25, 26PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENT, Chief Judge.
In these actions the petitioner has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as provided by Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915. Each of the actions is a civil action against a person who was a witness against the defendant when he was tried for and convicted of armed robbery in the Circuit Court for Branch County, Michigan. Each of the suits is instituted under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1331 and § 1343 and under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, § 1985 and § 1986.
In his “Judicial Allegations” the petitioner alleges in Paragraph 5 of each complaint that each…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- R. W. Agnew v. City of Compton, a Municipal Corporation H. R. Lindemulder and Frank SpragueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- McGuire v. ToddCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- People v. BurnsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Pritt v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dickinson v. FrenchDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1976