Legal Opinion
Masiongale Electrical-Mechanical, Inc. v. Construction One, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 2004No. 2002-1861PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} In this ease, we are called upon to interpret R.C. 4113.61, known as the Prompt-Payment Act, with respect to a contractor’s right to withhold payment from a subcontractor. Construction One, Inc. appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Appeals, which affirmed the judgment of the common pleas court to award Masiongale Electrical-Mechanical, Inc. attorney fees and prejudgment interest as a result of Construction One’s noncompliance with R.C. 4113.61. Because Masiongale’s breaches of the lien-waiver and forum-selection clauses in the subcontract did not create “disputed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Independence v. Kerr Construction Paving Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Jenkins, Inc. v. Walsh Bros., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Electrical Engineering & Electronics, Inc. v. E.L. Shea, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2001
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gary Moderalli Excavating, Inc. v. Trimat Constr., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- H & H Glass, Inc. v. Empire Bldg. Co., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Frank Novak & Sons, Inc. v. A-Team, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Xtreme Elements, L.L.C. v. Foti Contracting, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.