Legal Opinion

City of Independence v. Kerr Construction Paving Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1997No. WD 51016PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMART, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal of an action under the “Public Works Prompt Pay Statute,” § 34.057, RSMo 1994. The statute provides for penalties for late payment of subcontractors and material suppliers on public works projects, and allows recovery of attorney’s fees by the prevailing party in such litigation. In this case, as to the major issue of attorney’s fees, the trial court denied attorney’s fees to the subcontractor, the prevailing party. Because we conclude that the trial court erred in its interpretation of the statute, we reverse the judgment in part and affirm in part.

FAC…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Douglass v. SafireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Camdenton Consolidated School District No. 6 Ex Rel. W. H. Powell Lumber Co. v. New York Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. State Ex Rel. LeFevre v. StubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. Blake v. IrwinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. A. Scott Enterprises v. City of Allentown, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Jerry Bennett Masonry, Inc. v. Crossland Const. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Day Advertising Inc. v. DeVries & Associates, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Environmental Protection, Inspection, & Consulting, Inc. v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Brooke Drywall of Columbia, Inc. v. Building Construction Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API