Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Warner
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
— This is an action to recover the sum of five hundred dollars alleged to be due the plaintiff for conducting water, sufficient for irrigation purposes, upon the lands of defendant, under a contract made between the parties. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was a corporation, incorporated under the laws of this state, and engaged in the business of diverting water from Kings River, and supplying therewith, for irrigation and other useful purposes, the people of Fresno County. The answer denied that the plaintiff was a corporation, and also denied the making of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Close v. Glenwood CemeterySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.California Supreme Court · 1869
- Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. WoodburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Lehman, Durr & Co. v. WarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
3Cited by25 opinions
- Yancy v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Tangora v. MatankyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Vivion v. National Cash Register Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. Copren Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Spokane & Idaho Lumber Co. v. LoyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.