Cindy Gregory v. Town of Pittsfield
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Justice O’Connor, with whom Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall join,
dissenting.
This petition raises important and unresolved issues concerning the protection afforded by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to applicants for general assistance. Because the decision below relies on a questionable reading of this Court’s precedent to hold that such applicants are entitled to no procedural safeguards whatsoever and, alternatively, that state law remedies provide sufficient due process, I would grant certiorari.
Petitioner Cindy Gregory and her husband on April 13, 1982, filed an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.