Legal Opinion

Clinton Cooperative Farmers Elevator Ass'n v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 1947No. 34,323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magnet, Justice.

Plaintiff an!d defendant are cooperative associations. The former is a member and stockholder of the latter. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendant, its officers, and agents from purchasing for its own account grain which has been consigned to defendant for sale by defendant as a commission merchant. Defendant was organized under L. 1923, c. 326, as amended, and is licensed as a commission merchant by the state railroad and warehouse commission pursuant to Minn. St. 1941, c. 223 (§§ 223.01 to 223.11).4 The complaint alleges violation by defendant of L. 1917, c. 19 (which as §§…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brainerd Dispatch Newspaper Co. v. County of Crow WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Burt v. ClagueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farmers Cooperative Co. v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1949
  2. Hedback v. American Family Mutual Insurance (In Re Mathews)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  3. Clinton Coop. F. E. Assn. v. Farmers U. G. T. Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API