Legal Opinion
Brainerd Dispatch Newspaper Co. v. County of Crow Wing
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 17, 1936No. 30,599PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hilton, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment or a neAV trial after a verdict had been directed for plaintiff in an action brought to recover under a contract for Avork done.
Prior to January i, 1933, the plaintiff, Brainerd Dispatch Newspaper Company, a corporation, entered into an agreement with all the other legal neAvspapers in CroAv Wing county Avhereby it Avas agreed that plaintiff was to submit the only bid for the county printing; that the bid would be at the highest legal rate allowed by statute; that each paper entering…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Hyer v. Richmond Traction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Regan v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Barnes v. TauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Douglas Shoe Co. v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- BAKER v. RANGOSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Clinton Cooperative Farmers Elevator Ass'n v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Turner v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Clinton Coop. F. E. Assn. v. Farmers U. G. T. Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Horne v. Federal Reserve Bank of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1964