Legal Opinion
United States v. Van
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 30, 1991No. 90-1834PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.
In this expedited appeal respondent/appellant Vito Van appeals the district court’s order enforcing a subpoena issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) on ADT Engineering, Inc. (“ADT”)1 to produce all employment records relating to employees hired on or after November 7, 1986. Because we conclude that Vito Van lacks standing to appeal, we DISMISS the appeal.
FACTS
On January 3, 1990, petitioner/appellee Francis D. Falkowski, an INS assistant director for investigations, issued and served on ADT a subpoena directing ADT to appear on January 9,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. MinkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of David Morganstern and Fred MorgansternCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Wood v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Cundiff v. Cundiff (In Re Cundiff)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Cherry Hill Vineyards, LLC v. LillyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.