People v. Delgado
California Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
*493KENNARD, J., Concurring and Dissenting.
At defendant’s jury trial for the crime of kidnapping for robbery (Pen. Code, § 209, subd. (b)(1)),1 the prosecution’s evidence showed that defendant personally robbed but did not personally kidnap the victim; rather, he aided and abetted the kidnapper. The trial court did not, however, instruct the jury on the law of aiding and abetting, but only on the liability of a direct perpetrator for the crime of kidnapping for robbery, of which defendant was later convicted.
Like the majority, I conclude that the trial court’s omission of aiding and abetting…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. BeemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. PrettymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.