Legal Opinion

United States v. WH Pollard Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 7, 1954No. 33615PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, District Judge.

The United States of America brings this action for property damage to a government owned vehicle arising out of an intersection accident — asserting that the damage was caused by defendant’s negligence. The action was brought some six years after the date of the accident. Defendant answered, set up the contributory negligence of the government driver as a defense and asked for an affirmative judgment against the United States based on the same negligence in a pleading denominated as a “cross-complaint”. The United States moves to dismiss this cross-complaint on grounds…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United States v. Norwegian Barque TheklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. United States v. SilvertonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Di Norscia v. TibbettSuperior Court of Delaware · 1956
  2. United States v. Southern Pacific CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1962
  3. United States v. Webb Trucking Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956
  4. Canned Foods, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Keckley v. PaytonDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API