Legal Opinion

Crowley v. Thomson

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1953No. L. A. 22577PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff which ordered the dissolution of their partnership and the distribution of its assets. The appeal is on the judgment roll.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into a partnership agreement for the purpose of redrilling an oil well known as “Bowles No. 1.” The agreement in part provided that: (1) Defendant would transfer an oil lease to the partnership subject to an overriding royalty of 7½ per cent. (“Bowles No. 1” was on the property covered by this lease.) (2) Plaintiff would contribute 75 per cent and defendant 25 per cent of the monies…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boston Iron & Metal Co. v. S. S. Winding GulfDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kovacik v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Lewis v. FirestoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API