Legal Opinion

Fordham Hoisting Equipment Co. v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 19, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.

After trial before the court without a jury, decision was reserved. Formal findings of fact and conclusions of law were waived.

The defendant insurance carrier refused to defend the insured plaintiff. They hired counsel who successfully defended them. Plaintiff now brings this action to recover reasonable counsel fees.

The policy of insurance, in evidence, contains the usual liability coverage. It provides that insured must give notice “ as soon as practicable ”, upon occurrence of an accident. The company agrees to pay “ all sums which the insured shall become obligated to pay, ’ ’ by reason…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Wagman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Wachtel v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Bazar v. Great American Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Narduli v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API