Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Royal v. Linn

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1904No. 5121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application filed in tbe supreme court April 18, 1904, for a writ of prohibition to prevent the superior court of Thurston county, Linn, J., from permitting the withdrawal and amendment of a proposed statement of facts.

1Per curiam

This is an original application in this court for a writ of prohibition, directed to the superior court of Thurston county, and to the Hon. O. V. Linn, judge thereof. The conceded facts are substantially as follows: In a certain cause pending in said court, the relator herein procured a judgment against the Horthem Pacific Pailway Company. The latter filed and served a proposed statement of facts. Ten days expired, and no amendments were offered by the relator, and thereupon the court certified the proposed statement; but there was included in it as certified a page of purported exceptions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. RousseauWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State ex rel. Hersner v. ArthurWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State ex rel. Fetterley v. GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grobe v. Valley Garbage Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Weatherall v. WeatherallWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Johnson v. Washington Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Livermore v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API