Legal Opinion
Baynard, Et Ux. v. City of St. Petersburg
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 5, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
The appeal is from an order overruling motion to dismiss bill of complaint as amended.
The purpose of the bill of complaint is to foreclose special assessment certificates. The suit was brought in the name of City of St. Petersburg for the use and benefit of Glenn V. Leeland, as Receiver of the Certificate Sinking Fund of the City of St. Petersburg against Certain Lands upon which Special Assessments are delinquent and the City of St. Petersburg, a municipal corporation, under the provisions of Chapter 14392, Acts of 1929.
The record shows that the City of St. Petersburg issued certificates of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Florida Land Rock Phosphate Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- City of Coral Gables v. Certain Lands Upon Which Taxes Are DelinquentSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- City of Miami v. Certain LandsSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- State v. City of St. PetersburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Degge v. First State Bank of EustisSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- State Ex Rel. First Presbyterian Church v. FullerSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- McCann v. City of St. Petersburg Ex Rel. LelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Horne v. City of OcalaSupreme Court of Florida · 1940