Legal Opinion
Cafritz Const. Co. v. Mudrick
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 31, 1932No. 5470PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
An appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered by the lower court after plaintiff had elected to stand upon its amended declaration, to which a demurrer had been interposed and sustained.
The amended declaration alleges, in substance, that on February 14, 1930, the defendants executed and delivered to Morris Cafritz their two certain promissory notes, payable to Ms order; the first note calling for $3,500 payable in monthly installments of $45 each until paid, the second note being for $1,000, payable one year after date. The notes were secured by a; deed of trust…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Railroad Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Noell v. GainesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Moline Plow Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Keene Five Cent Sav. Bank v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Yasuna v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Huntley v. BortolussiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Kaufman v. Penn Mut. Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Feucht v. KellerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Von Blaine v. SaundersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.