Legal Opinion

State v. Estes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1988No. WD 39565PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAITAN, Judge.

Appellant, Bobby R. Estes, was charged and found guilty as a result of a trial by jury of the sale of diazepam, a controlled substance, in violation of § 195.240, RSMo 1986. He was fined $1,000. He appeals his conviction and the fine alleging the trial court erred as a matter of law by failing to sustain his objection to the drug investigation that led to his arrest because it was in violation of § 43.380, RSMo 1986 which mandates how the Missouri Highway Patrol may be called into a drug investigation. We affirm.

This appeal is based solely on the appellant’s motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. State v. ElginSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. State v. HarperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State of Missouri v. Robert A. WooleryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. MurphyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API