Legal Opinion

Marefield Meadows, Inc. v. Lorenz

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 26, 1993No. Record 920883PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacy

In this appeal we consider whether a contract existed for the purchase of a stallion and, if so, whether the evidence was sufficient to establish the amount of damages sustained by the sellers as a result of a breach of that contract.

In June 1987, Marefield Meadows, Inc. (MFM) and Regula Lorenz, operating as Chestnut Hollow Stable (Lorenz), entered into a partnership agreement for the joint acquisition and care of a Hanoverian stallion, Maronjo. Under the agreement MFM had a two-thirds ownership interest in the stallion and Lorenz had a one-third interest. The agreement also divided liability…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co. v. Universal Moulded Products Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  2. Lucy v. ZehmerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. McMunn v. TatumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. Wells v. WestonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  5. Appalachian Power Co. v. John Stewart Walker, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Federal Signal Corp. v. Safety Factors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Forbes v. RappSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  3. Monahan v. Obici Medical Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  4. Kettler & Scott, Inc. v. Earth Technology CompaniesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. PuryearSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API