Legal Opinion

Tiger v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 3, 1917No. 4486PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction of murder with the death penalty assessed.

Besides appellant there were but two eyewitnesses to the killing, Will Carter and Mamie Chappel. Appellant did not testify. Mamie Chappel, by her own testimony, had been the “kept” woman of appellant for a long time, and until shortly before the killing. The killing occurred in her house. The deceased, Claude Hughes, was a white man; the appellant, a negro. The deceased was killed by being shot. Pour bullets struck him. One entered the front of his neck, a little to the right of the center, and went…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gillespie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Ex parte LynchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API