Legal Opinion

Lave v. Dretke

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 22, 2006No. 04-70035PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

Joseph Lave appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated under a retroactive application of the Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), which held that testimonial, out-of-court statements are inadmissible unless the witness is unavailable to testify and the defendant has had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness about the statement. Id. at 59, 124 S.Ct. 1354.

The facts of this case were detailed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Ennis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Ex Parte LaveCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Scott Panetti v. William Stephens, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API