Lave v. Dretke
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
Joseph Lave appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated under a retroactive application of the Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), which held that testimonial, out-of-court statements are inadmissible unless the witness is unavailable to testify and the defendant has had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness about the statement. Id. at 59, 124 S.Ct. 1354.
The facts of this case were detailed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Ennis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Ex Parte LaveCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Scott Panetti v. William Stephens, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.