Legal Opinion

Fodi's v. Rutherford

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided February 3, 1998No. 1239973PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Judge.

Fodi’s and its insurer (“employer”) appeal the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s decision awarding Karen Rutherford temporary total disability benefits based upon a change in condition. Employer argues that Rutherford’s claim for reinstatement of benefits based on a change in condition was barred by the doctrine of res judicata because of the factual findings made by the commission when deciding the initial claim. We disagree and affirm the commission’s decision.

Code § 65.2-101 defines a “change in condition” as “a change in the physical condition of the employee as well as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Worrie v. BozeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  2. King's Market v. PorterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. Amp, Inc. v. RuebushCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
  4. Mize v. Rocky Mount Ready Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1991

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rusty's Welding Service, Inc. v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  2. Painter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  3. Neff v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
  4. Wainwright v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  5. Debra Levy v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API