Mize v. Rocky Mount Ready Mix, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
*603Opinion
COLEMAN, J.
The claimant, Roger Wayne Mize, filed a motion to reopen his application for workers’ compensation benefits, alleging that he obtained new and additional evidence after the deputy commissioner’s hearing but before review by the commission. The commission, invoking Rule 2(C),1 denied the motion. We hold that because the commission based its refusal to reopen on the misconception that the newly obtained evidence could form the basis for filing a new change of condition application, when in fact the issue raised in such application for a change in condition would become barred…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BurnsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- King's Market v. PorterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Amp, Inc. v. RuebushCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- Stover v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1971
- Taylor v. Maritime Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. People's Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
- Fodi's v. RutherfordCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Colonnades Marriott v. Princess E. DurdenCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Mildred F. Gravely v. Rappahannock General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- Mildred F. Gravely v. Rappahannock General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.