Legal Opinion
Sirkis v. Cohen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 7, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the defendants Brooklyn Sawdust Construction, Inc., Israel Berkovic, Levi Berkovic, and Raizy Berkovic appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated June 16, 2004, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to “restore” the action to active status.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ motion to “restore” the action to active status (see Long-Waithe v Kings Apparel Inc., 10 AD3d 413, 414 [2004]; Baez v Kayantas, 298…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fry v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Parker v. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Murray v. T.W. Smith Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Baez v. KayantasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Long-Waithe v. Kings Apparel Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MBIA Ins. Corp. v. Royal Bank of CanadaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Goldenberg v. Westchester County Health Care Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- John M. Horvath, D.C., P.C. v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceNassau County District Court · 2009
- NGH Associates, Ltd. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2007