Legal Opinion

King v. Granger, No. Sph-9103-59800 (Jul. 6, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 6, 1992No. SPH-9103-59800Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION In this case the defendant seeks to reopen a stipulated judgment which concluded a summary process action brought on the basis of non-payment of rent. Her motion raises interesting questions regarding the relationship between stipulated judgments and the mutual rights and responsibilities of Section 8 landlords and tenants. For the reasons set forth below the defendant's motion is granted. The stipulated judgment is reopened and the parties are directed to recalculate the defendant's arrearage…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Solomon v. KeiserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  2. Housing Authority v. LamotheConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API