Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. Continental Associates

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1991No. 689 and 690PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

In this opinion we are called upon to determine whether a landowner out of possession of premises leased to a tenant may be held liable for injuries sustained by the tenant’s employee from a fall on a stairway which was wet and slippery from accumulated rainwater. We find that the condition of the stairway was not a hidden or concealed defect and was discoverable by the tenant. Hence, the landowner owed no duty to the tenant’s employee and may not be held liable for the injuries sustained. For the reasons which follow, we vacate the order entered by the trial court and remand to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Burch v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Harris (Et Ux.) v. Lewistown Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Orner v. MallickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Goodman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Henze v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jones v. LevinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Brown, D. v. The End Zone, IncSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. M.S. v. Cedar Bridge Military AcademyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Berwind Row, LLC v. Teeter, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. DeRafelo v. DeCicci, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API