Legal Opinion

Constant v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 19, 1980No. 406-78PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

*151Chapter 17 of the Patent Act of 19521 66 Stat. 805, 35 U.S.C. §§ 181 et seq., authorizes the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, when a patent application has been filed and the publication or disclosure of the invention by the grant of a patent might be detrimental to the national security, to order that the invention be kept secret and to withhold the grant of a patent so long as the national interest requires. 35 U.S.C. § 181.2 It then becomes a criminal offense for private persons, knowing of the order and without authorization, to publish or disclose the invention or material…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Farrand Optical Co., Inc. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  4. Franco-Italian Packing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Otto Halpern v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gordon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. American Telephone & Telegraph Co v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. Constant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Constant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API