Legal Opinion

Franco-Italian Packing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 8, 1955No. 50268PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

The plaintiff is seeking compensation for an alleged temporary taking by the defendant of certain of plaintiff’s property shortly after the December 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor. The theory of plaintiff’s claim is that various incidents of interference in plaintiff’s use of its property amounted to a compensable taking under the fifth amendment to the Constitution. It is defendant’s position that. any acts of interference to plaintiff’s property rights which occurred were only the consequential result of valid sovereign acts of control and regulation and, therefore, not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Radioptics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  2. Al-Quraishi v. NakhlaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  3. Davidson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. City of Rapid City v. BolandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API