Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 27, 2007No. 1060926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On February 25, 2005, Jammy Bell filed a postconviction petition pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., challenging the validity of his conviction for second-degree receipt of stolen property and his sentence of 25 years in prison. After a hearing, the circuit court denied his petition.

Bell appealed the circuit court's denial of his petition to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Before that court, Bell argued, among other issues, that the circuit court erred in denying his claim that the State had failed to prove venue and that, therefore, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to enter the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Ivey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Ex Parte WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Ex Parte CulbrethSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  5. Sciscoe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parmelee v. O'NEELCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Parmelee v. O'NeelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Bailey v. City of RaglandCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  4. Ex Parte BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. Patzka v. HooksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API