Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentDavid T. Prosser, J.
¶ 59. (dissenting). Wisconsin law has become unintelligible in explaining what rights and remedies are available to persons who have been injured by state or local government. The purpose of this dissent is to provide an overview of this dilemma and to show how it has led to a serious injustice in the present case.
I
¶ 60. In 1962, this court abrogated the principle of governmental immunity from tort claims. Holytz v. City of Milwaukee, 17 Wis. 2d 26, 115 N.W.2d 618 (1962). Our court declared that few tenets of American jurisprudence had been so unanimously berated as the governmental immunity…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.