Greenfield v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, Rofio Greenfield, appeals from the habeas court’s judgment denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that he failed to prove his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, the petitioner claims that he was denied effective assistance when his trial counsel permitted the trial court to comment on reasons why the petitioner may have chosen not to testily at *584his criminal trial. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. ReidConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. YurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Alterisi v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
4Cited by2 opinions
- Robichaud v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Williams v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003