Owner Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n Inc. v. Comerica Bank
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Comerica Bank (“Comerica”) moves to dismiss (docket no. 28) the second amended complaint filed by Plaintiffs Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (“OOIDA”), Carl Harp, and Michael Wiese (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Comerica’s motion.
II. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs seek to enforce the final judgment entered by this Court on July 16, 2004, in OOIDA v. Arctic Express, Inc., No. 97-750 (the “Arctic Litigation”). Harp and Wiese are “owner-operators” of trucking…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Friedman v. Estate of PresserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Owner Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Comerica Bank (In Re Arctic Express Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- MedChoice Financial, LLC v. ADS Alliance Data Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Owner Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Comerica BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Patterson v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2012
- Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Comerica BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.