Murray v. Whittaker
Illinois Supreme Court
The opinion of the court embodies a statement of the case. The proceedings complained of were had before Woodson, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtSkinner, J.
The record of thiis case shows that the cause
had been remanded on reversal of a former judgment, by this court to the Circuit Court of Morgan county, for trial de novo, and that at a term of said court prior to the October term, 1854, the cause was docketed and continued to the next term. At the next term, judgment by default for want of a plea, was rendered against defendants below, and the plaintiffs recovered judgment for their debt and damages.
At the same term the defendants appeared, and on their motion this judgment was set aside. The defendants then pleaded to the action, and moved for…
2Cited by7 opinions
- The People v. CallopyIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Lind v. SpannuthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
- Lind v. SpannuthIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Gage v. People ex rel. HanbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Hirsh v. Ogden Furniture & Carpet Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.