Giddings v. Rogers
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JESSE D. GIDDINGS, : Plaintiff : : No. 1:22-cv-00097 v. : : (Judge Kane) LT. ROGERS, et al., : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Currently before the Court is the sole remaining Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on pro se Plaintiff’s claim under
42 U.S.C. § 1983
for excessive force in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background Pro se Plaintiff Jesse D. Giddings (“Giddings”), who is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.