Legal Opinion

Giddings v. Rogers

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00097Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JESSE D. GIDDINGS, : Plaintiff : : No. 1:22-cv-00097 v. : : (Judge Kane) LT. ROGERS, et al., : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Currently before the Court is the sole remaining Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on pro se Plaintiff’s claim under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

for excessive force in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background Pro se Plaintiff Jesse D. Giddings (“Giddings”), who is…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API