Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1995No. 9426DC239Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Defendant argues that the trial judge’s sole finding related to retroactive child support is actually a conclusion of law, and, therefore, the order for retroactive child support is not supported by the findings.

The judge’s only finding related specifically to retroactive child support was “6. A reasonable amount of past child support, for the period September 1, 1992, through December 31, 1992, is $500 per month.” Defendant is correct in his contention that this finding is a conclusion and is therefore insufficient to support the order for retroactive child support.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Plott v. PlottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Savani v. SavaniCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API