Legal Opinion

Carmody v. Peck

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided September 9, 1986No. File 240108PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMulcahy, J.

This is an action in the nature of an interpleader seeking a determination regarding priorities in the distribution of monies realized on the sale of real estate from the decedent’s estate. Both the United States and the state of Connecticut have substantial claims for unpaid taxes. The action, as initially brought by the administrator, d.b.n., named both the state and the internal revenue service of the United States as party claimants. On November 25,1985, the court, D. Dorsey, J., dismissed the internal revenue service as a party defendant and granted the government’s motion to file a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. Gilbert Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Price v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. United States v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. In re Valerie D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. State v. CourchesneConnecticut Superior Court · 1999
  4. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API