Ex Parte State Health Planning and Dev. Agency
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The central issue in these appeals is whether vendors that provide mobile lithotripsy1 equipment to hospitals are providing a "health service" requiring a "certificate of need" ("CON") under Ala. Code 1975, § 22-21-263(a)(4). The Court of Civil Appeals answered this question in the negative, holding that "the health-care facilities and HMOs [health maintenance organizations] that provide health services must seek CON review in connection with providing such a service[; however, the] sellers or vendors of equipment that health-care facilities and HMOs use in order to provide such services need…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nationsbank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hulcher v. TauntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Farmer v. Hypo Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- QCC, INC. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- PRIME LITHOTRIPTER OPER. v. LithoMedTech of Alabama, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 64 v. Personnel Board of Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- Ex parte Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Jemmstone Alabama, LLC v. Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission) (Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-23-901800).Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2024
- Ex parte Teachers' Retirement System of Alabama PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: Teachers' Retirement System of Alabama and Employees' Retirement System of Alabama v. Baldwin County Planning and Zoning Department; Baldwin County Board of Adjustment No. 1; and Point Clear Property Owners Association, Inc.) (Baldwin Circuit Court: CV-21-900858; Civil Appeals CL-2022-0697).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2025