Legal Opinion

United States v. Durkin

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 30, 1971No. 71 Cr. 1229PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Four defendants, under indictment for possession and conspiracy to possess seventy-two counterfeit Federal Reserve notes, move pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to suppress such notes as evidence on the trial on the ground that they were illegally seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment stricture against unreasonable search and seizure.

A hearing was held, at which time the following facts were adduced. Max Young was an employee of the entity which services the coin rental lockers at the Port Authority bus terminal in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MatthewsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. WeissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. People v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Chenkin v. BELLEVUE HOSP. CTR., NYC, ETC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  5. People v. PontoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API