Legal Opinion

W. T. Cowan, Inc. v. Wagshal

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1946No. 353PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff sued to recover the value of a shipment of canned ham allegedly damaged or lost through the negligence of defendant, a motor carrier. There were two trials of the case. The first resulted in a finding for defendant; but on plaintiff’s motion this finding was vacated and a new trial granted. A different judge conducted the second trial and found in favor of plaintiff for the full amount of his claim. Defendant brings this appeal.

Plaintiff’s evidence revealed that he was in the food distribution business; that five cases of canned hams were shipped to him from New…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SilversteinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Campbell v. WillisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
  3. Franklin v. Chas. C. Schulman Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Jensen v. CloudMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Peay v. ParksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Krupsaw v. W. T. Cowan, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Hoover v. BabcockDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API