Legal Opinion

Oxford International Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 27, 1975No. Court Nos. 66/74958, etcPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ee, Judge:

The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise manufactured in and imported from Hong Kong. The merchandise consists of three kinds of bicycle taillights invoiced as “Oxford Brand AInTniTmm Tail Lites #155KJ”, “Plastic Tail Lites #156”, and “Cycle Direction Signal Tail Lites #140”.

The merchandise was classified under item 653.40 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as:

“Illuminating articles and parts thereof, of base metal:

* He * * ' * Hi Hi

Other:

Hi HI * Hi Hi Hi *

Other”

and was consequently…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Nomura (America) Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Nomura (America) Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. A & A International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  2. Supermarket Systems, U.S., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API