Legal Opinion

N.H.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 25, 2008No. 2B06-5287PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Judge.

The State filed a petition for delinquency alleging that N.H.M. committed the crimes of robbery and carrying a concealed weapon. At the conclusion of the delinquency trial, the trial judge concluded that the State had not proven that N.H.M. committed a robbery but that the evidence was sufficient to support a finding that N.H.M. committed the lesser-included crime of battery. N.H.M. objected that battery was neither a necessary lesser-included offense of robbery nor a crime charged in the petition for delinquency. Nevertheless, the trial court entered the order now on appeal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. S.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Jaramillo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. B.S.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carswell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. A.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. J. M. v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  4. L.C.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. NHM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API