N.H.M. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ALTENBERND, Judge.
The State filed a petition for delinquency alleging that N.H.M. committed the crimes of robbery and carrying a concealed weapon. At the conclusion of the delinquency trial, the trial judge concluded that the State had not proven that N.H.M. committed a robbery but that the evidence was sufficient to support a finding that N.H.M. committed the lesser-included crime of battery. N.H.M. objected that battery was neither a necessary lesser-included offense of robbery nor a crime charged in the petition for delinquency. Nevertheless, the trial court entered the order now on appeal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- S.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Jaramillo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- B.S.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carswell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- A.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- J. M. v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- L.C.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- NHM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.