Legal Opinion

B.S.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 28, 1996No. 94-03863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.

B.S.W. challenges his conviction and sentence for battery, a violation of section 784.03, Florida Statutes (1993). He argues that since the allegations of the state’s petition only outline the crime of robbery it was error for the trial court to find him guilty of battery. He is correct because battery is a Category 2 lesser-included offense of robbery. See Fla.Std. Jury Instr. (Crim) 295. For the trial court to convict upon proper proof of a Category 2 lesser-included crime, the allegations of the charging document must also contain the elements of such crime. See…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Jaramillo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. C.F. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mauldin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. N.H.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Lawrence v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. K.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. L.C.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API