Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2018No. 2017-1715 and 2017-1716Published

1DissentKennedy, J.

{¶ 30} When an offender violates the terms of his or her postrelease control by committing a new felony, the offender may be prosecuted for the new felony and judicially sanctioned with a prison term for the postrelease-control violation.

*774R.C. 2929.141(A). At issue in this case is whether Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) requires a trial court taking a guilty plea to the new felony to advise the accused that an additional, consecutive sentence for the postrelease-control violation may be imposed.

{¶ 31} A trial court may accept a plea only if it is knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Woods v. TelbOhio Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API